shermarama: (Default)
Sherm ([personal profile] shermarama) wrote in [personal profile] devi 2007-05-11 02:43 pm (UTC)

I really like the second one. I could say, particularly because there's enough mass of pale foreground branching stuff to change the emphasis and make it look like it could be a picture of a great variety of things, of which trees is one of the less likely. Some weird angle through a tangle of nerves on the inside of an eyeball, perhaps.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting