Whooo should you vote for? Who who? Who who?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Who should you vote for?
Dennis Kucinich | ![]() | 120 | ||
Mike Gravel | ![]() | 108 | ||
Barack Obama | ![]() | 101 | ||
John Edwards | ![]() | 91 | ||
Hillary Clinton | ![]() | 87 | ||
Rudy Giuliani | -15 | ![]() | ||
Ron Paul | -27 | ![]() | ||
John McCain | -36 | ![]() | ||
Fred Thompson | -72 | ![]() | ||
Mitt Romney | -117 | ![]() | ||
Duncan Hunter | -132 | ![]() | ||
Mike Huckabee | -138 | ![]() |
Your recommendation: Dennis Kucinich
Party: Democratic
Born: 1946, Cleveland, Ohio
Family: Married three times; one daughter
Career: Radio talk-show host, lecturer, consultant
Political career: Cleveland City Council (1969); Mayor of Cleveland (1977-79); Incumbent Member of the US House of Representatives from Ohio's 10th district
Hot topic: Federally funded healthcare to all citizens
Did you know? When Kucinich refused to sell Muni Light, Cleveland's publicly owned electric utility, the Cleveland mafia put a hit on him. A hitman from Maryland planned to shoot him in the head during the Columbus Day Parade, but the plot fell apart when Kucinich was hospitalized and missed the event.
Supported by: Viggo Mortensen, Sean Penn
***
There are Obama posters popping up in Oxford already and it isn't even our election. Last night Dan and I found ourselves watching The Manchurian Candidate - the remake, that is - which I'd somehow thought was a running-and-shouting-and-exploding standard thriller. Instead it was a paranoia-filled conspiracy theory drama happening around a US election, clearly scripted by people who'd watched an awful lot of The West Wing. All the fake news footage with its clunky graphic design took me back to our all-night election party of 2004. Hey, party round mine this November! With donuts! And hopefully this one won't end in despair!
no subject
Given that this quiz is entitled "Who Should You Vote For?" the Democrat Electability question could be reworded as "I'm happy for the Republicans to win the election because I was too idealistic to vote tactically". And then that question should be weighted by comparing your other answers to the leading Republican candidates and scaling up accordingly. It would end up being the only question that matters!
no subject
no subject
After all, there are US politicians who aren't candidates at all who are a far better match for my views.