Whooo should you vote for? Who who? Who who?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Who should you vote for?
Dennis Kucinich | ![]() | 120 | ||
Mike Gravel | ![]() | 108 | ||
Barack Obama | ![]() | 101 | ||
John Edwards | ![]() | 91 | ||
Hillary Clinton | ![]() | 87 | ||
Rudy Giuliani | -15 | ![]() | ||
Ron Paul | -27 | ![]() | ||
John McCain | -36 | ![]() | ||
Fred Thompson | -72 | ![]() | ||
Mitt Romney | -117 | ![]() | ||
Duncan Hunter | -132 | ![]() | ||
Mike Huckabee | -138 | ![]() |
Your recommendation: Dennis Kucinich
Party: Democratic
Born: 1946, Cleveland, Ohio
Family: Married three times; one daughter
Career: Radio talk-show host, lecturer, consultant
Political career: Cleveland City Council (1969); Mayor of Cleveland (1977-79); Incumbent Member of the US House of Representatives from Ohio's 10th district
Hot topic: Federally funded healthcare to all citizens
Did you know? When Kucinich refused to sell Muni Light, Cleveland's publicly owned electric utility, the Cleveland mafia put a hit on him. A hitman from Maryland planned to shoot him in the head during the Columbus Day Parade, but the plot fell apart when Kucinich was hospitalized and missed the event.
Supported by: Viggo Mortensen, Sean Penn
***
There are Obama posters popping up in Oxford already and it isn't even our election. Last night Dan and I found ourselves watching The Manchurian Candidate - the remake, that is - which I'd somehow thought was a running-and-shouting-and-exploding standard thriller. Instead it was a paranoia-filled conspiracy theory drama happening around a US election, clearly scripted by people who'd watched an awful lot of The West Wing. All the fake news footage with its clunky graphic design took me back to our all-night election party of 2004. Hey, party round mine this November! With donuts! And hopefully this one won't end in despair!
no subject
Interesting I got Mike Gravel. Both him and Kucinich are pretty much out of the running, but as pointed out by a few people here, running is often to a) gain experience b) push an agenda c) make some waves.
Merely mentioning universal health care and reformation of tax structures brings a debate in that wouldn't have otherwise existed. Same with Ron Paul. He'd not win, but he's creating enough of stir to be taken notice off.
Bateleur's argument is specious in a primary election. It's not about voting for who you like best who you think might win. In fact that's a daft way to decide your vote in any election. You don't get a prize for picking the winning or second placed candidate....