messages in tiny bottles
May. 17th, 2009 05:03 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
21:48 Vicariously Eurovisioning. #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitterEdit: ...and I think I'll turn off LoudTwitter again now. I thought it'd annoy people when they were still sending tweets to phones, because anyone on twitter would see the same messages at least twice. When they stopped sending to phones it seemed like a much better idea. But now it seems like lots more people are following Twitter at the webpage, so sending them to LJ seems redundant again.
I might turn it back on the next time I'm travelling, though. My travelling tweets are usually a bit more interesting than my stationary ones, and it's likely there'll be more of them in a day, so together they're more like an actual post with, y'know, actual content. So there seems more justification in sending them to LJ. And I enjoy the LoudTwitter digests of people out doing stuff - exploring strange places, or doing 140-character gig reviews from Down The Front.
What do you think? Do you always hate LoudTwitter like poison? Or does it make a difference how contentful the posts are?
no subject
Date: 2009-05-17 02:02 pm (UTC)Ahah. The instructions are at: http://mouser.livejournal.com/379686.html
So, if you wish, you can restrict the twitterings to a specific friends group (
lj-security: twit
). Or even just to yourself (in case you want to collect the to form the basis of a full LJ entry). And, as described, you can hide them behind a cut.So, while I'm quite happy to read your twits directly off the website you might want them shipped across for your own benefit.
Incidentally, Vodafone are currently providing free text-to-twitter (http://online.vodafone.co.uk/dispatch/Portal/appmanager/vodafone/wrp?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=template10&pageID=MI_0044) service. They're also doing a free twitter-to-text service, which, allegedly, isn't limited time. (Of course, that's until they change their minds!)