There's a time and place for literary nitpicking, and this probably isn't it

[devi]

I'm off out to vote shortly. Just to make sure I haven't missed anything crucial, I had another look at the manifestos of the two parties I've been vacillating between.

Is it wrong to feel more affectionate towards one party because their manifesto is snappy, specific, well-written and has nice fonts and nice graphic design, while the other is full of densely packed, long, rambly sentences of vague upper-manglement-speak that made my head swim?

Never mind foreign affairs, education or the economy! Check out the use of sans-serif!


Edit (back now): And I didn't realise UKIP's logo was a pound sign. Ew, how tacky.

Comments

[dyddgu.livejournal.com]

Oh, do. It's very, very devastating indeed. None of them come out of it particularly well...

[bluedevi.livejournal.com]

But then if it was nice to anyone it wouldn't be the Private Eye we know and love, would it?

[rowan-leigh.livejournal.com]

They were nice about Beagle 2, before it had been launched and disappeared off the face of Mars. :)

[ksta.livejournal.com]

s/come/comes

;p

[dyddgu.livejournal.com]

The s on my keyboard is a bit dodgy when I type at speed, it seems...